In terms of performance and the cost is clearly a genuine comparison here for the Gtx titan z vs 2080 Ti.
It is worth the GTX TITAN Z worth noting that it is a very ravenous power card and requires a decent power supply unit.
In terms of memory, the GTX TITAN Z RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any deadlocks.
In summary, the performance is exceptional; there is no doubt that this is one of the most powerful graphics cards.
Graphics Card | Core Speed/Boost Clock | Technology | Retailer |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 5/5 | 1350 MHz/1635 MHz | 12nm | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan Z 3/5 | 705 MHz/876 MHz | 28nm |
Gtx Titan Z Vs 2080 Ti: Detail Comparison & Product Overview
Let’s see below the below comparisons with simple tables that you will love.
Briefly About The Product
Titan z 2080 ti | |
Video card Nvidia Geforce gtx titan z | Video card Nvidia Geforce rtx 2080 ti |
12288 mb gddr5 video memory | 11264 mb gddr6 video memory |
Core / Memory Frequency: 705/7000 MHz | Core / Memory Frequency: 1770/14140 MHz |
Sli / crossfire support | NVLink support |
Dvi x2, hdmi, display port connectors | Connectors hdmi, display port x3, USD type-c |
Support for Directx 12, opengl 4.4, vulkan | Support for Directx 12, opengl 4.6, vulkan |
Work with 4 monitors | Work with 4 monitors |
A Type
Not support mac | Not support mac |
Graphics Card Name : NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Graphics Card Name : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
Line : GeForce | Line : GeForce |
Graphics Card Developer : NVIDIA | Graphics Card Developer : NVIDIA |
PCI Express Version : 3.0 | PCI Express Version : 3.0 |
Connection Type : PCI-E 16x | Connection Type : PCI-E 16x |
Number of video processors : 2 | Number of video processors : 1 |
GPU frequency , 705MHz | GPU frequency , 1770 MHz |
Memory
Memory type : GDDR5 | Memory type : GDDR6 |
Memory Bus Width : 768 bits | Memory Bus Width : 352 bit |
Memory frequency , 7000MHz | Memory frequency , 14140MHz |
The amount of video memory (detail) , 12288 MB | The amount of video memory (detail) , 11264MB |
Functionality
No 3-Way SLI Support | No 3-Way SLI Support |
No Crossfire X Support | No Crossfire X Support |
No Turbo Cache / Hyper Memory Support | No Turbo Cache / Hyper Memory Support |
Number of monitors supported : 4 | Number of monitors supported : 4 |
Connection
Display Port Output | Display Port Output |
HDMI output | HDMI output |
HDCP support | HDCP support |
No Mini HDMI Output | No Mini HDMI Output |
No Micro HDMI Output | No Micro HDMI Output |
No Mini Display Port Output | No Mini Display Port Output |
No VGA output | No VGA output |
No Vivo | No Vivo |
No Tv out | No TV out |
No Component Video Output | No Component Video Output |
No Built-in TV tuner | No Built-in TV tuner |
HDMI Type : 1.4a | HDMI Type : 2.0b |
Number of HDMI 1Outputs | Number of HDMI 3 Outputs |
Number of DisplayPort 1 Outputs | Number of Display Port 3 Outputs |
Standards Support
Gtx Titan Z 2080 Ti | |
CUDA Support | CUDA Support |
Vulkan Support | Vulkan Support |
Support AMD APP (ATI Stream) | Support AMD APP (ATI Stream) |
DirectX Version : 12 | DirectX Version : 12 |
OpenGL Version : 4.4 | OpenGL Version : 4.6 |
OpenCL Version : 1.2 | OpenCL Version : 2.0 |
Maximum Resolution : 4096×2160 | Maximum Resolution : 7680×4320 |
CUDA Version : 3.5 | CUDA Version : 7.1 |
Cooling
Passive cooling | Passive cooling |
Cooling system design: reference | Cooling system design: custom |
Number of fans: 1 | Number of fans : 3 |
Design
Low Profile Card | Low Profile Card |
Length 267mm | Length290 mm |
The number of 3occupied slots | The number of 3occupied slots |
Height 111 mm | Height 134 mm |
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX TITAN Z – Heavy gaming Card
The announcement of a new “two-headed monster” called the GeForce GTX TITAN Z took place at the end of March at the 2014 GTC (GPU Technology Conference).
NVIDIA Corporation proudly refers to its brainchild as “the fastest graphics card in the world.”
The new ultimatum model combines two fully functional (not trimmed) graphics chips with the GK110 marking, built on the Killer architecture.
We see the same GPUs that stand alone in the most productive so far video cards Gtx Titan Z Vs 2080 Ti.
Each such full-fledged chip has at its disposal 2880 CUDA cores, therefore, in the new product, their total number is 5760.
Also, in the aggregate, the announced video card has 12 GB of GDDR5 memory and an access bus of 768 bits.
Individually, each GPU has 6 GB of memory, a 384-bit bus, and a base clock frequency of 705 MHz.
However, the GPU Boost 2.0 feature allows you to “overclock” each graphics core to 876 MHz.
The manufacturer claims that the texture fill rate is 338 gigapixels per second. The maximum memory bandwidth is at 672 GB / s. Computing performance is 8 TFLOPS.
Specifications:
GeForce GTX TITAN Z specifications are listed.
- 7000 MHz memory clock
- Processor Technology 28 nm
- Memory size 12GB
- 384×2 bit memory bus
- Core Clock Base / Boost Clock: 706/876 MHz
- PCI-E 3.0 Bus Card
- GDDR5 memory type
- DirectX 11.2
- OpenGL 4.4
- ATX PCB Form
- Maximum digital resolution 4096 X 2160
- Maximum analog resolution 2048 x 1536
- Multi-view 4
- Connections
- Dual-link DVI-I * 1
- DVI-D * 1
- Display Port * 1
- HDMI * 1
- 700W Power Requirements
Specifications Table
GEFORCE GTX TITAN Z | |
Chip code | Gk110 |
Architecture | Kepler |
Process technology | 28 nm |
Base clock | 705 MHz |
Clock Speed with Boost | 876 MHz |
CUDA Cores | 5760 |
Memory type | Gddr5 |
Memory bus | 768 bit |
Memory | 12 GB |
Maximum temperature | 95 s |
Power consumption | 375 watts |
- The fastest ever single-GPU card ever
- Excellent design
- Capable of playing any of the games in the world at 4K resolutions with high detail settings
- Very expensive did not afford everyone
- Overkill for 1080p and 1440p gaming
Conclusion
It remains to add that the recommended retail price of new items for the United States is $$$$.
Who will be interested in this model? According to the developers, it should be of interest to the most demanding users who are already waiting for games with a resolution of 5K, or owners of multi-display configurations.
GEFORCE RTX 2080 TI – Best Budget Gaming Graphics card
NVIDIA announced the most productive video card of 2018 on August 20.
The novelty received the name GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, and despite belonging to the GeForce series, it is positioned by the manufacturer as a graphic adapter of the level of video cards of the TITAN line of past generations.
NVIDIA RTX TECHNOLOGY
For those who are not knowns with recent events, let’s say that the top-end video cards of the new 20-series GeForce were called RTX NVidia titan 2080 ti, instead of the old GTX.
This change is due to the introduction of the NVIDIA RTX ray tracing technology of the same name in the Pascal graphics architecture.
You can learn more about the new method of graphic processing from this article. If we say very briefly about the latest technology, then it allows you to bring the visual component of many computer games to a whole new level.
It applies to the reflection of models, refraction of light, dimming, the appearance of shadows, and many other moments.
The effect of this technology can be seen below on the demo video of the Metro Exodus game.
The creators of computer games are already adopting new technology from NVIDIA, and the first games with the RTX function will appear very soon.
SPECIFICATIONS
The base of the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti video adapter is the TU102 graphics processor.
This GPU received tensor kernels for deep learning operations and the functioning of the DLSS smoothing mode, as well as RT kernels for updated ray tracing.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
GPU model (architecture) | TU102 (Turing) |
Process technology | TSMC 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 18.6 billion |
CUDA Streaming Processors | 4352 |
Tensor Cores | 544 |
RT Cores | 68 |
Texture blocks | 272 |
Rendering units (ROPs) | 88 |
Base core frequency | 1350 MHz |
Boost Core Frequency | 1635 MHz |
Memory bus | 352 bit |
Memory frequency | 1750 MHz |
Memory | 11 GB |
Memory type | Gddr6 |
Throughput | 616 GB / s |
Energy consumption | 260 watts |
Min system requirements | 650 watts |
GPU maximum temperature | 89 ° C |
Interface | PCI-E 3.0 |
Add. nutrition | 2x 8-pin |
Communication | 2x NVLink |
And the transition to a new standard for video memory GDDR6 increased throughput to 616 GB / s. As for the amount of memory, it remained the same as its predecessor – 11 GB.
Among the Turing architecture innovations, we highlight the DLSS smoothing mode (the name is an abbreviation of the term Deep Learning Super Sampling).
This algorithm is a logical development of the TAA smoothing method because it does not always work perfectly and is the cause of artifacts.
Unlike TAA, the Deep Learning Super Sampling mode allows you to display games in 4K with a maximum level of detail, with a higher FPS value and without annoying jerks.
The only caveat is that the DLSS method is innovation and requires its implementation in games directly by its developers. An example of the operation of this algorithm can see on the example of the game Final Fantasy XV.
- Capable of 4K all the gaming at 60fps
- DLSS is another exciting and highly efficient feature with a ton of potential
- Sets a new bar quality for single-GPU performance
- Only of the real option for 4K PC gaming
CONCLUSION
The new flagship from NVIDIA allows you to run absolutely all games at the time of their release with a stable 60 FPS in 4K resolution.
True, sometimes with a slight adjustment of the settings. As for the NVIDIA RTX function, it will be possible to talk about this later.
When at least several game projects with support for this option will be released, and when it will be possible to test them “live.”
Most likely, in 2018, the model considered in this review will remain the top one.
But next year, it is quite possible that NVIDIA will announce something new, such as TITAN RTX, on a full-fledged, not “trimmed” version of the TU102 core.
COMPARISON OF ALL NVIDIA GEFORCE GRAPHICS CARDS
We bring to your attention the most comprehensive list of comparative testing of NVIDIA video processors.
The review presents video cards for both desktop computers and laptops.
The test carries out in the most famous and popular benchmark, 3Dmark. In the table, you can see the rating of the video card and compare its performance with other models.
For a complete picture, the release date and price of the graphics adapter also indicate. A dash in the column indicates the lack of information at present.
A value of “n / a” means that NVIDIA has not officially announced the price of this video card.
More graphics cards and can also see their pricing and rating.
Rating | Model | Devices | 3Dmark Fire Strike | Release date | Price in USA |
1 | GTX TITAN Z | desktop | 35141 | 05/28/14 | $2999 |
2 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | desktop | 30950 | 2017/04 | $ 1200 |
7 | NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal | desktop | 27270 | 2016/08 | $ 1199 |
2 | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | desktop | 34280 | 2018/12 | $ 2499 |
8 | GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | laptop | 25180 | 2019/01 | n / a |
3 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | desktop | 31090 | 2018/09 | $ 999 |
4 | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | desktop | 28680 | 2019/07 | $ 699 |
5 | GeForce RTX 2080 | desktop | 28050 | 2018/09 | $ 699 |
16 | GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | laptop | 20390 | 2019/01 | n / a |
9 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | desktop | 23830 | 2019/07 | $ 499 |
10 | GeForce RTX 2070 | desktop | 22310 | 2018/09 | $ 499 |
22 | GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | laptop | 18630 | 2019/01 | n / a |
13 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | desktop | 21420 | 2019/07 | $ 399 |
17 | GeForce RTX 2060 | desktop | 20240 | 2019/01 | $ 350 |
60 | GeForce MX350 new | laptop | 4350 | 2020/02 | n / a |
71 | GeForce MX250 | laptop | 3710 | 2019/02 | n / a |
72 | GeForce MX150 | laptop | 3690 | 2017/05 | n / a |
95 | GeForce MX130 | laptop | 1810 | 2018/01 | n / a |
117 | GeForce MX110 | laptop | 1295 | 2018/01 | n / a |
fifteen | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | desktop | 20750 | 2014/03 | $ 2999 |
14 | GeForce GTX TITAN X | desktop | 20780 | 2015/03 | $ 999 |
32 | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | desktop | 11800 | 2014/02 | $ 999 |
35 | GeForce GTX TITAN | desktop | 11650 | 2013/02 | $ 999 |
40 | GeForce GTX 980M | laptop | 9660 | 2014/10 | n / a |
21 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | desktop | 18720 | 2015/06 | $ 649 |
27 | GeForce GTX 980 | desktop | 13926 | 2014/09 | $ 549 |
47 | GeForce GTX 970M | laptop | 7460 | 2014/10 | n / a |
31 | GeForce GTX 970 | desktop | 11890 | 2014/09 | $ 329 |
57 | GeForce GTX 965M | laptop | 5690 | 2015/01 | n / a |
61 | GeForce GTX 960M | laptop | 4310 | 2015/02 | n / a |
45 | GeForce GTX 960 | desktop | 7810 | 2015/01 | $ 200 |
77 | GeForce GTX 950M | laptop | 3160 | 2015/03 | n / a |
53 | GeForce GTX 950 | desktop | 6180 | 2015/08 | $ 159 |
52 | GeForce GTX 880M | laptop | 6090 | 2014/03 | n / a |
58 | GeForce GTX 870M | laptop | 4690 | 2014/03 | n / a |
69 | GeForce GTX 860M | laptop | 3890 | 2014/03 | n / a |
79 | GeForce GTX 850M | laptop | 3080 | 2014/03 | n / a |
55 | GeForce GTX 780M | laptop | 5240 | 2013/05 | n / a |
33 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | desktop | 11780 | 2013/11 | $ 699 |
37 | GeForce GTX 780 | desktop | 10810 | 2013/05 | $ 649 |
75 | GeForce GTX 770M | laptop | 3340 | 2013/05 | n / a |
42 | GeForce GTX 770 | desktop | 8860 | 2013/05 | $ 399 |
83 | GeForce GTX 765M | laptop | 2470 | 2013/05 | n / a |
87 | GeForce GTX 760M | laptop | 2270 | 2013/05 | n / a |
54 | GeForce GTX 760 | desktop | 5950 | 2013/06 | $ 250 |
62 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | desktop | 4290 | 2014/02 | $ 149 |
74 | GeForce GTX 750 | desktop | 3560 | 2014/02 | $ 119 |
29 | GeForce GTX 690 | desktop | 13100 | 2012/03 | $ 999 |
59 | GeForce GTX 680MX | laptop | 4450 | 2012/10 | n / a |
65 | GeForce GTX 680M | laptop | 4040 | 2012/06 | n / a |
46 | GeForce GTX 680 | desktop | 7580 | 2012/03 | $ 408 |
81 | GeForce GTX 675MX | laptop | 2820 | 2012/10 | n / a |
85 | GeForce GTX 675M | laptop | 2320 | 2012/03 | n / a |
84 | GeForce GTX 670MX | laptop | 2360 | 2012/10 | n / a |
92 | GeForce GTX 670M | laptop | 1950 | 2012/03 | n / a |
48 | GeForce GTX 670 | desktop | 7246 | 2012/05 | $ 330 |
99 | GeForce GTX 660M | laptop | 1740 | 2012/03 | n / a |
56 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | desktop | 5420 | 2012/08 | $ 299 |
63 | GeForce GTX 660 | desktop | 4280 | 2012/09 | $ 229 |
67 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | desktop | 3810 | 2013/03 | $ 170 |
76 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | desktop | 3140 | 2012/10 | $ 130 |
91 | GeForce GTX 650 | desktop | 2010 | 2012/09 | $ 110 |
51 | GeForce GTX 590 | desktop | 6250 | 2011/03 | $ 699 |
90 | GeForce GTX 580M | laptop | 2120 | 2011/06 | n / a |
39 | GeForce GTX 580 ASUS MarsII | desktop | 9950 | 2011/06 | n / a |
64 | GeForce GTX 580 | desktop | 4080 | 2010/11 | $ 499 |
111 | GeForce GTX 570M | laptop | 1480 | 2011/06 | n / a |
68 | GeForce GTX 570 | desktop | 3790 | 2010/12 | $ 349 |
119 | GeForce GTX 560M | laptop | 1160 | 2011/05 | n / a |
66 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | desktop | 3860 | 2011/11 | $ 289 |
78 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | desktop | 3110 | 2011/01 | $ 249 |
96 | GeForce GTX 560 SE | desktop | 1807 | 2011/05 | n / a |
80 | GeForce GTX 560 | desktop | 2990 | 2011/05 | $ 199 |
97 | GeForce GTX 555 OEM | desktop | 1798 | 2011/07 | n / a |
102 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | desktop | 1620 | 2011/03 | $ 149 |
93 | GeForce GTX 485M | laptop | 1894 | 2010/01 | n / a |
105 | GeForce GTX 480M | laptop | 1545 | 2010/05 | n / a |
70 | GeForce GTX 480 | desktop | 3790 | 2010/03 | $ 499 |
115 | GeForce GTX 470M | laptop | 1405 | 2010/11 | n / a |
82 | GeForce GTX 470 | desktop | 2750 | 2010/03 | $ 349 |
88 | GeForce GTX 465 | desktop | 2270 | 2010/05 | $ 279 |
126 | GeForce GTX 460M | laptop | 960 | 2010/09 | n / a |
86 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | desktop | 2290 | 2010/11 | $ 199 |
98 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | desktop | 1785 | 2010/11 | $ 240 |
89 | GeForce GTX 460 | desktop | 2250 | 2010/07 | $ 229 |
25 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | laptop | 14780 | 2019/04 | n / a |
19 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | desktop | 19830 | 2019/02 | $ 279 |
23 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | desktop | 18350 | 2019/10 | $ 229 |
26 | GeForce GTX 1660 | desktop | 14680 | 2019/03 | $ 219 |
41 | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | laptop | 9233 | 2019/04 | n / a |
28 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | desktop | 13560 | 2019/11 | $ 159 |
38 | GeForce GTX 1650 | desktop | 10760 | 2019/04 | $ 149 |
12 | GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | laptop | 21490 | 2016/08 | n / a |
6 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | desktop | 27800 | 2017/10 | $ 699 |
11 | GeForce GTX 1080 | desktop | 21840 | 2016/05 | $ 599 |
24 | GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | laptop | 17960 | 2016/09 | n / a |
18 | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | desktop | 20060 | 2017/11 | $ 449 |
20 | GeForce GTX 1070 | desktop | 19160 | 2016/06 | $ 399 |
36 | GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | laptop | 11500 | 2016/08 | n / a |
50 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | laptop | 6370 | 2017/01 | n / a |
43 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | laptop | 7900 | 2017/01 | n / a |
44 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | desktop | 7890 | 2016/10 | $ 139 |
49 | GeForce GTX 1050 | desktop | 6790 | 2016/10 | $ 109 |
107 | GeForce GTS 450 | desktop | 1530 | 2010/09 | $ 129 |
104 | GeForce GT 750M | laptop | 1570 | 2013/04 | n / a |
109 | GeForce GT 745M | laptop | 1520 | 2013/04 | n / a |
122 | GeForce GT 740M | laptop | 1140 | 2013/03 | n / a |
124 | GeForce GT 735M | laptop | 1020 | 2013/04 | n / a |
125 | GeForce GT 730M | laptop | 1000 | 2013/01 | n / a |
129 | GeForce GT 720M | laptop | 820 | 2013/04 | n / a |
114 | GeForce GT 650M | laptop | 1410 | 2012/03 | n / a |
121 | GeForce GT 645M | laptop | 1150 | 2012/03 | n / a |
94 | GeForce GT 645 | desktop | 1823 | 2012/06 | n / a |
129 | GeForce GT 640M LE | laptop | 870 | 2012/03 | n / a |
108 | GeForce GT 640 GDDR5 | desktop | 1520 | 2012/06 | n / a |
112 | GeForce GT 640 DDR3 | desktop | 1470 | 2012/06 | n / a |
135 | GeForce GT 635M | laptop | 740 | 2011/12 | n / a |
136 | GeForce GT 630M | laptop | 720 | 2011/12 | n / a |
133 | GeForce GT 630 | desktop | 782 | 2012/05 | $ 60 |
139 | GeForce GT 620M | laptop | 710 | 2012/03 | n / a |
130 | GeForce GT 555M | laptop | 800 | 2011/01 | n / a |
137 | GeForce GT 550M | laptop | 720 | 2011/01 | n / a |
138 | GeForce GT 540M | laptop | 710 | 2011/01 | n / a |
140 | GeForce GT 525M | laptop | 680 | 2011/01 | n / a |
131 | GeForce GT 445M | laptop | 795 | 2010/09 | n / a |
132 | GeForce GT 440 | desktop | 790 | 2011/02 | $ 90 |
73 | GeForce GT 1030 | desktop | 3590 | 2017/05 | $ 70 |
100 | GeForce 940MX GDDR5 | laptop | 1740 | 2016/03 | n / a |
101 | GeForce 940MX DDR3 | laptop | 1620 | 2016/03 | n / a |
103 | GeForce 940M | laptop | 1620 | 2015/03 | n / a |
110 | GeForce 930MX | laptop | 1570 | 2016/03 | n / a |
113 | GeForce 930M | laptop | 1450 | 2015/03 | n / a |
118 | GeForce 920MX | laptop | 1280 | 2016/03 | n / a |
120 | GeForce 920M | laptop | 1160 | 2015/01 | n / a |
106 | GeForce 840M | laptop | 1530 | 2014/03 | n / a |
116 | GeForce 830M | laptop | 1390 | 2014/03 | n / a |
127 | GeForce 820M | laptop | 890 | 2014/01 | n / a |
134 | GeForce 710M | laptop | 769 | 2013/04 | n / a |
123 | GeForce 640M | laptop | 1084 | 2012/03 | n / a |
Conclusions
Before buying a video card, you need to decide what it is for which one that is best suited for your needs.
If it is not of fundamental importance for the user to create the chip, then it becomes possible to choose the number of graphics adapters.
It will work most of which can serve as gaming ones, which means that they meet the most stringent requirements.
We hope Gtx Titan Z Vs 2080 Ti comparison will like it. Let’s put the feedback and your reviews.